[modeller_usage] Re: Using frcmod+off non-standard residue in modeller.
To:
Subject: [modeller_usage] Re: Using frcmod+off non-standard residue in modeller.
From: Modeller Caretaker <>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:10:59 -0700
On 8/15/24 8:37 AM, Pedro Guillem via modeller_usage wrote:
> I'm using Modeller to mutate only. I was wondering how hard it would be
> to mutate any position into a non-standard residue. I have my residues
> in Amber format (frcmod+off), and I read that I must create the
> definitions in CHARMM (RST) format, so modeller understands its
> topology+charges,etc.
If I were in your position, I would just run a short constrained
simulation in Amber instead, since you already have the files in the
right format and Amber will likely do a better job with the non-standard
residue anyway. Modeller is primarily designed for comparative modeling,
and so relies on template information; in cases like mutation where you
don't have this information, it's not going to do as good a job.
> I see that ParmED (for example) can import the Amber files and generate
> RST files from them, but I didn't fully understand how many files I must
> modify in modeller, or whether I should use the BLK option, but it is
> not very well documented how to do so.
A BLK or '.' residue just copies the residue's coordinates from the
template and then treats it as a rigid body. That's probably not going
to be useful here since a) you don't have a template and b) you
presumably want to relax the conformation of the mutated residue.
Ben Webb, Modeller Caretaker
--
https://salilab.org/modeller/
Modeller mail list: https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/modeller_usage