 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In the discussion of the previous section, we have assumed that the
sequences or structures would be compared in a pairwise manner.
However, such pairwise comparisons of several related proteins may not
be self consistent, ie the following transitivity rule can be
broken: If residue  from protein
 from protein  is equivalent to residue
 is equivalent to residue  in protein
in protein  which in turn is equivalent to residue
 which in turn is equivalent to residue  in protein
 in protein
 then the residue
 then the residue  from protein
 from protein  must also be equivalent to
residue
 must also be equivalent to
residue  from protein
 from protein  . This property is not always attained in
the set of usual pairwise comparisons relating a group of similar
proteins. For this reason we proceed by simultaneously aligning all
proteins. This is achieved by aligning the second sequence with the
first one, the third sequence with the alignment of the first two, 
etc. A more general tree-like growth of the multiple alignment is
not yet implemented.
. This property is not always attained in
the set of usual pairwise comparisons relating a group of similar
proteins. For this reason we proceed by simultaneously aligning all
proteins. This is achieved by aligning the second sequence with the
first one, the third sequence with the alignment of the first two, 
etc. A more general tree-like growth of the multiple alignment is
not yet implemented.
If the number of all proteins is  ,
,  alignments must be made to
obtain the final multiple comparison. It is noted that once an
equivalence or gap is introduced it is not changed in later stages.
 alignments must be made to
obtain the final multiple comparison. It is noted that once an
equivalence or gap is introduced it is not changed in later stages.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
