Daniel Russel wrote: > It probably better to call it UnaryFunction rather than UnaryFunctor as > unary functors already mean something more general in C++ (any functor > that takes one variable). I guess strictly speaking it should be > UnaryRealFunction, but we can get elide the Real. Fair enough; as of r319 they are UnaryFunctions. Ben -- ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/ "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle