![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fdfa2a028c1b769ce3090ac37c7bc6a7.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
sometime the check requires more than a single command. do we have something like : IF_USAGE_AND_INTERNAL
??
thanks, Keren.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/cfe8857a24d561e8e700ab18e3ba7ec8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 1/23/10 9:13 PM, Keren Lasker wrote: > sometime the check requires more than a single command. > do we have something like : IF_USAGE_AND_INTERNAL
IMP_IF_CHECK(USAGE_AND_INTERNAL)
Ben
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fdfa2a028c1b769ce3090ac37c7bc6a7.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
THANKS! On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Ben Webb wrote:
> On 1/23/10 9:13 PM, Keren Lasker wrote: >> sometime the check requires more than a single command. >> do we have something like : IF_USAGE_AND_INTERNAL > > IMP_IF_CHECK(USAGE_AND_INTERNAL) > > Ben > -- > ben@salilab.org http://salilab.org/~ben/ > "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." > - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle > _______________________________________________ > IMP-dev mailing list > IMP-dev@salilab.org > https://salilab.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
participants (2)
-
Ben Webb
-
Keren Lasker