[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[modeller_usage] IS SCWRL4 helpful for Models

To: modeller <modeller_usage@listsrv.ucsf.edu>
Subject: [modeller_usage] IS SCWRL4 helpful for Models
From: Ashish Runthala <ashishr AT bits-pilani.ac.in>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:48:23 +0530 (IST)

MODELLER9v9 models couldn't be improved further with SCWRL4. There was no difference in the GDT, TM_Score and RMSD statistics of model with and without SCWRL usage. 
So are all the side chain rotamer loci best optimized with the Calpha atom topologies? 

Thanks
Ashish


Ashish Runthala,
Lecturer, Structural Biology Cell,
Biological Sciences Group,
BITS, Pilani
Rajasthan, INDIA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [modeller_usage] IS SCWRL4 helpful for Models
  - From: Thomas Evangelidis <tevang3 AT gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [modeller_usage] How to get Secondary Structure in Alignment file
Next by Date: Re: [modeller_usage] IS SCWRL4 helpful for Models
Previous by thread: Re: [modeller_usage] modeller_usage Digest, Vol 10, Issue 62
Next by thread: Re: [modeller_usage] IS SCWRL4 helpful for Models
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread