[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
New to... (cont!!!!)
- To: <modeller_usage@listsrv.ucsf.edu>
- Subject: New to... (cont!!!!)
- From: "Luis Rosales" <ludwig AT biomedicas.unam.mx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:16:44 -0600
- Organization: IIBM
- Reply-to: "Luis Rosales" <ludwig AT biomedicas.unam.mx>
Hi:
So far, I know:
1) structureX or structure didn´t make a difference (I used both)
2) As far as the manual goes, the minimum second line of a sequence can be:
"structure:1cx1" or as complex as "structure:1cx1: : : : : : : :" or
"structureX:1cx1:FIRST:@:LAST:@"
anyway none of they works....
3)However, I can run the examples and get the apropriate result on them
(doing the "Run_tests" or "mod6v2 topfile.top").
And I used to think of the Xplor language as complicated.... ;)
Thanks, Luis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guittet, Muriel" <Guittet AT vegmail.ucdavis.edu>
To: "Luis Rosales" <ludwig AT biomedicas.unam.mx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:27 PM
Subject: RE: New to mod6v2 (cont...)
> Hi,
> I'm sorry... At first look I don't know what could be wrong.
> I just saw once in the users' list that it was better to use "structureX"
than "structure" alone (but I know it should work with structure...)
> I cannot read exactly if there isn't a blank after 1cx1 in your aln file
(I don't know if it is important or not, but I encountered some tricky
problems like using caps or not, or because my file was an rtf file instead
of a txt one... so)
> At least, aren't you supposed to precise the name of the chain even if it
is FIRST:@:LAST:@
> good luck
> Muriel
>